🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a solid starting point," stated the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow this example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from the West, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this international debate continues, the steps of Australia and others demonstrate that states globally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.